Legal Opinion

Krahn v. Goodrich

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1917PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Sault ■county: James O’Neill, Judge. Action to enforce a lien on real estate. Tbe issues were decided as tbe following abridgment of tbe findings indicates : (1) April 19, 1897, G-ottfried Scbiefelbein owned tbe southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of section!, town 12, range 3 east, in Sauk county, Wisconsin.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Sault ■county: James O’Neill, Judge. Action to enforce a lien on real estate. Tbe issues were decided as tbe following abridgment of tbe findings indicates : (1) April 19, 1897, G-ottfried Scbiefelbein owned tbe southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of section!, town 12, range 3 east, in Sauk county, Wisconsin. (2) July 5, 1883, defendant owned and sold on land contract to said Scbiefel-bein tbe west one-half of said southeast quarter, agreeing to Heed tbe same to him on payment of $1,600 and interest as specified, and tbe vendee was…

1Opinion of the Court

Makshai/l, J.

Many interesting questions are presented for consideration here, but, as what follows will show, we have not been able to proceed far before reaching an insuperable infirmity in the judgment.

Serious objection is made to the findings as a whole; but it does not seem necessary to deal therewith. We will consider only such features as seem to shed some light on the-vital point to which we h^ve referred and the features directly involved therein, some of which are not really findings, of fact, though harmlessly classed as such'.

The finding that the farm was worth $4,000 on.the 19th…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tweeddale v. TweeddaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Becker v. ChesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Wier v. SimmonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Korn v. FrizWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Oneida County v. TibbitsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Isham v. MullallyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Angelo v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Chase National Bank v. SchleussnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Farrar v. YoungWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Luedtke v. LuedtkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API