Legal Opinion

Luedtke v. Luedtke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

In order to set aside such findings of the court it must appear that they are contrary to the clear preponderance of the evidence. While plaintiff’s deposition was being taken in the hospital in December, 1922, after the commencement of this action, the plaintiff unquestion*477ably was in an enfeebled condition of health, due not only to the infirmities of old age but to illness. We have read this deposition carefully, and we are convinced that it discloses a mental condition on the part of the plaintiff at that time, for a man of his age, which is unusual. In the course of his examination he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wier v. SimmonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Korn v. FrizWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Merton v. O'BrienWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Krahn v. GoodrichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Powers v. PowersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Bailey (In Re Bailey)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1982
  2. McIntyre v. CoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Shearer v. PringleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API