Legal Opinion
Kaufman v. Seidman
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided January 31, 1992No. 1:90-CV-446PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HILLMAN, Senior District Judge.
In this case, plaintiff Richard Kaufman alleges that his former accountant gave him false and misleading investment advice, resulting in substantial losses for Kaufman and the Kaufman family businesses. Kaufman’s amended complaint charges that between 1983 and 1986, defendants BDO Seidman, Kaufman’s accounting firm, and David Fies, a partner in the accounting firm, failed to disclose material information about investments which Seid-man and Fies recommended. The complaint also charges that the accountants failed to disclose their lack…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Tafflin v. LevittSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kaufman v. BDO SeidmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Kaufman v. Bdo SeidmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993