Legal Opinion

DeLisle v. Cape Mutual Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 12, 1984No. 13314PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUS, Judge.

By his petition J. Byron DeLisle, the named insured, sought to recover upon a policy of fire insurance issued by defendant Cape Mutual Insurance Company. The in sured real property was a home in Portage-ville owned and occupied by J. Byron DeLi-sle and Madelon DeLisle, his wife. In response to the defendant’s objection to the interest and capacity of J. Byron DeLisle, Madelon DeLisle was added as a party plaintiff.

The defendant admitted the policy was in force and the insured property was damaged by a fire. It denied the insured’s compliance with the policy and disputed the extent…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. DeWitt v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. DeArmon v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Grand Lodge of United Brothers of Friendship & Sisters of Mysterious Ten v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  5. Kirst v. Clarkson Construction CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. David A. Kostelec v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986
  3. Catron v. Columbia Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  4. Hocker Oil Co. v. Barker-Phillips-Jackson, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. McKinney v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API