Legal Opinion
Clark v. Chase Nat. Bank
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 1, 1948PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONDY, District Judge.
In one of the above entitled actions the Attorney General, as successor to the Alien Property Custodian, moves for a decree declaring that he is entitled to the possession of the balance remaining to the credit of the Deutsche Reichsbank on the books of the respondent Federal Reserve Bank of New York and in the other he moves for a decree declaring that respondents Zittman, *741McCarthy and McCloskey, as sheriff, did not obtain any lien or other interest in the Reichsbank-Direktorium or Deutsche Gold-diskontbank accounts on the books of the respondent Chase National Bank,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Markham v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Commission for Polish Relief, Ltd. v. Banca Nationala a RumanieiNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Singer v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Clark v. Manufacturers Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Clark v. PropperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zittman v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Zittman v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- In Re De Gheest's EstateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- McCloskey v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- J. Howard McGrath Attorney General, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian v. Chase National Bank of City of New York, and John J. McCloskey Jr., as Sheriff, of the City of New York, and Leo Zittman and John F. McCarthy J. Howard McGrath Attorney General, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and John J. McCloskey Jr., as Sheriff of the City of New York, and Leo Zittman and John F. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.