Legal Opinion
Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 18, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2017-0034Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LARRY KLAYMAN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-34 (TJK) JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This Opinion concerns the latest in a long line of disputes between Plaintiff Larry Klayman and Defendant Judicial Watch, Inc. Klayman accuses Judicial Watch’s President, Thomas Fitton, of having perjured himself in a declaration submitted to the Court. Based on this purported misconduct, Klayman has moved for entry of judgment in his favor. ECF No. 29 (“Mot.”). As explained below, Klayman’s motion will be denied.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Michele E. Shepherd and Larue Graves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Sharon Bonds v. District of Columbia and Director, District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- William C. Shea v. Donohoe Construction Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Webb v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.