Legal Opinion

Connor v. Thompson Construction & Development Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 11, 1969No. 52502PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAWLINGS, Justice.

By law action plaintiffs seek recovery of damages from defendant contractors for fire loss caused by faulty installation of electrical outlet in newly constructed residence. On defendants’ motions trial court entered judgments on the pleadings adverse to plaintiffs and they appeal. We affirm in part, reverse in part.

Originally William and Selma Connor, were sole plaintiffs, they being sometimes hereafter referred to as Connors or owners.

Original defendants included Wayne J. Paulson, architect, but an order of dismissal as to him is not challenged and any action against that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck and Company v. PolingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  2. Kent v. BaileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Builders & Mfrs. Mut. Casualty Co. v. Preferred Automobile Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  4. Miller v. KujakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Smith v. RyanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Iowa Fuel & Minerals, Inc. v. Iowa State Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  2. Zettel v. Paschen Contractors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Neubauer v. HostetterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  4. Stetina v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Midwest Lumber Co. v. Dwight E. Nelson Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API