George v. Bowler
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker
¶1 Plaintiffs Robert George and Tina George (the Georges) appeal the Fourth Judicial District Court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants Curtis Bowler and Jean Bowler (the Bowlers). The dispositive issue on appeal is:
Did, the District Court correctly grant summary judgment to the defendants on the basis of the Workers’ Compensation Act’s exclusivity provision?
We affirm.
PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
¶2 The Georges filed a complaint against the Bowlers arising from injuries Robert sustained on the Bowlers’ property. Robert was employed as a warehouse manager for Carpets Plus, a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Albert v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Phelps v. FramptonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- Brown v. EhlertMontana Supreme Court · 1992
- Horn v. Bull River Country Store Properties, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Johnson v. BoothMontana Supreme Court · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Aiking-Taylor v. SerangMontana Supreme Court · 2021