Legal Opinion
Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Co. v. Hardin
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided June 7, 1965No. Civ. A. 944PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN E. MILLER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment under the provisions of Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., is before the court for disposition. The parties have served and submitted elaborate and thorough briefs in support of their respective contentions, and none of the parties has requested oral argument, but in view of the extensive briefs, the court does not believe any useful purpose would be served by oral argument and the motion has been considered upon the exhibits thereto, the affidavits, the pleadings and briefs.
Before discussing the questions presented by the motion, we…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- New York Central Railroad v. LefkowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Public Service Commission v. New York Central RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1966
- CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. v. HardinDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1967
- Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. KasselCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.