Legal Opinion

Seay v. Southern Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 16, 1946No. 15817PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The rehearing of this case convinces us of the correctness of the opinion first filed, although we amplify same.

This action is the “second section” of that action brought by the identical plaintiffs against the identical defendants with the exception that Southern Railway Company, and not Southern Railway — Carolina Division, is the codefend-ant with Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Company in the present suit, for the wrongful death of Joe Walter Seay. See Seay et al., v. Southern Railway—Carolina Divi sion et al., 205 S. C., 162, 31 S. E. (2d), 133. That is to say, the present action…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  2. Seay v. Southern Ry. &8212 Carolina DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  3. Rookard v. Atlantic & Charlotte Air Line Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  4. Miller, Administrator v. A.C.L.R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  5. Harmon v. Columbia & Greenville RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rakestraw v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  2. Chapman v. Associated Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  3. Curry v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1954
  4. Central of Georgia Railway v. Walker Truck ContractorsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  5. Sunrise Fruit Co. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.Richmond City Circuit Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API