Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Wobig

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1921No. Docket No. 37PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Root (Jesse H.), J., presiding. Bill by Harry Goodman against Fred H. Wobig and another for specific performance of a contract.- From a decree for plaintiff, defendant Wobig appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This bill of complaint was filed to compel the specific performance of a contract. Plaintiff, Harry Goodman, is a mason contractor in Detroit. Defendant, Fred H. Wobig, was a manufacturer *52of motor valves. Mr. Goodman met Mr. Wobig about the first of September, 1919. Mr. Wobig interested Mr. Goodman in a proposition to purchase the machinery and equipment of the Meridian Machine Products Company, makers of motor valves. Negotiations were had for the purchase of the Meridian Machine Products Company, but nothing came of them. It is claimed that after the proposition to purchase the property of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Nichols, Shepard & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Nichols, Shepard & Co. v. MarshMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gillette v. Metzgar Register Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Gonser v. Leland Detroit Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API