Legal Opinion

800-209, LLC v. THE CINCINNATI INDEMNITY COMPANY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 31, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01101Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 800-209 LLC, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 24-01101 THE CINCINNATI INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant. OPINION Slomsky, J. July 31, 2025 I. INTRODUCTION This case arises from the denial of payment for “fire watch” coverage by Defendant The Cincinnati Indemnity Company (“Defendant”) under a commercial insurance policy issued to Plaintiff 800-209 LLC (“Plaintiff”).1 On February 15, 2022, Plaintiff reported a loss to Defendant after a standpipe in Plaintiff’s Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania property (the “Property”) separated,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Kaucher v. County of BucksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  5. Michelle Moody v. Atlantic City Board of EducatiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API