Legal Opinion

Hummel v. Hummel

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1958No. Civ. 9209PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure to vacate an interlocutory decree of divorce previously granted defendant on his cross-complaint.

The parties were married on August 23, 1952. On July 20, 1954, plaintiff filed her complaint for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty and alleged that certain parcels of real property were the community property of the parties. Defendant’s answer and cross-complaint admitted the allegation relative to the property. The trial court found that the previously mentioned real property was the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beard v. BeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hughes v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Colvin v. SibleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. In Re Estate of HarknessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Stahl v. FahrmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tammen v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Lutz v. SemcerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  4. Price v. HibbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Simmons v. SimmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API