Legal Opinion
Binford v. Shicker
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 26, 1990No. 10A04-8903-CV-080PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHEZEM, Presiding Judge.
Case Summary
Seller/Plaintiff/Appellant, David Bin-ford, appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Buyers/Defendants/Appellees, Norman and Cynthia Schicker. We affirm.
Issue
I. Whether the trial court erred in finding that the contract for the sale of land was ambiguous.
Facts
Norman Schicker was an employee of Binford. On July 24, 1986, Binford and the Schickers entered into a Lease Agreement and a Purchase Agreement for real estate located in Jeffersonville, Indiana. Both instruments were drafted by Binford’s attorney.
On December 15, 1987 and January 11, 1988, Norman…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kokomo Veterans, Inc. v. SchickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- RR Donnelley & Sons v. Henry-Williams, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Sharp v. Indiana Union Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Nylen v. Park Doral ApartmentsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Costanzi v. RyanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Michael Thalheimer v. Ramon and Stacey HalumIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- City of East Chicago v. Lake County Transfer, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006