Legal Opinion
Michael Thalheimer v. Ramon and Stacey Halum
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 13, 2012No. 49A02-1203-PL-167PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBB, Chief Judge.
Case Summary and Issues
Ramon and Stacey Halum (collectively, the “Halums”) entered into a contract with Michael Thalheimer for Thalheimer to remove carpet and tiles in the Halums’s home and to install new tiles. After Thal-heimer did so, a dispute arose among the parties regarding whether, when, and what Thalheimer would do about some portion of the work with which the Halums were dissatisfied. Following a bench trial, Thal-heimer appeals the trial court findings and judgment in favor of the Halums. Thal-heimer raises four issues, which we restate as: 1) whether the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- GKC Indiana Theatres, Inc. v. Elk Retail Investors, LLC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Gunkel v. Renovations, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Reed v. Central Soya Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- PM Gas & Wash Co., Inc. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- McCauley v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Berry Plastics Corporation v. Illinois National Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Berry Plastics Corporation v. Illinois National Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Dana L. Smith v. James L. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Douglas Alan Dyson v. Indiana Department of Environmental Management (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Glenny Cornwell and James Cornwell v. Bloomington Housing Authority (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.