Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hay v. Hay

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1951No. 31476Published

1DissentGrady, J.

(dissenting) — I am not in accord with the construction placed by the majority upon either subdivision (d) of Amended Article VI, or Rem. Rev. Stat., § 3823. I think the error becomes apparent when some of the history of The Big Bend Land Company is related.

The corporation was organized in 1901 to conduct a general real-estate business, to borrow and loan money, and to buy and sell merchandise. The capital stock consisted of $10,000, divided into 100 shares of common stock of the par value of $100 each. Later the capital stock was increased to $750,000. Lizzie L. Hay, now deceased, had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Penington v. Commonwealth Hotel Construction Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1931
  2. Penington v. Commonwealth Hotel Construction Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1930
  3. Michael v. Cayey-Caguas Tobacco Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  4. Jorguson v. Apex Gold Mines Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Austin v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API