Legal Opinion

Austin v. Wright

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1930No. 22130. Department OnePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This is. an action to foreclose a pledge of certain common corporate stock. From a decree of foreclosure as prayed for, this appeal is prosecuted. The facts, so far as presented by the record which is before us, are practically undisputed. It appears that in March, 1920, the' defendant O. K. Garage & Repair Shop, Inc., purchased' from John E. Austin and Rachel Austin, his wife,' certain real estate at the agreed price of $9,400, the purchase price to be paid by the issuance to the Austins of 940 shares of its preferred stock, which, as appears from the certificate in evidence, was dated March…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. Van AlstyneMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Jorguson v. Apex Gold Mines Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Crook v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. Kenigsberg v. ReiningerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. Peterson v. NelsonMontana Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Robey v. Walton Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Newcomer v. MasiniCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  3. Livingston v. SheltonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. BNC Mortgage, Inc. v. Tax Pros, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. BNC Mortgage, Inc. v. Tax Pros, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API