Legal Opinion
Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. Aronson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 3, 1985PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (George Bundy Smith, J.), entered April 15, 1985, which granted plaintiff-respondent’s motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213 is unanimously reversed, on the law, and plaintiff-respondent’s motion is denied, without costs. The moving and answering papers are deemed the complaint and answer, respectively, in accordance with CPLR 3213.
In October 1983, defendant-appellant William Aronson was employed as a broker by plaintiff-respondent Paine Webber. At the time of his employment Aronson executed a document entitled…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Maglich v. Saxe, Bacon & Bolan, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Illinois McGraw Electric Co. v. John J. Walters, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1959
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tradition North America, Inc. v. SweeneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987