Csa Service Center, Llc v. Air Design Systems
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
88, 92,
787 P.2d 777, 779
(1990). If the sanction is not case concluding, the district court has the discretion to decide whether or not to hold an evidentiary hearing on the abusive litigation practices before imposing the sanction. Bahena v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (Bahena I), 126 Nev. , ,
235 P.3d 592, 600-01
(2010). Thus, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing CSA's second amended complaint against A-1 and Air Design without an evidentiary hearing. These sanctions were not case concluding and were appropriate remedial measures for CSA's inappropriate…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Young v. Johnny Ribeiro Building, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1990
- Bass-Davis v. DavisNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Foster v. DingwallNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Stubli v. Big D International Trucks, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.