Legal Opinion

United States v. Button

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 11, 1992No. 66,097; ACM 27290PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

Appellant claims that extrinsic evidence of a witness’ prior inconsistent statement was erroneously admitted into evidence and that he was thereby prejudiced. For reasons set forth below, we agree that the evidence should not have been admitted but find no prejudice.

Consistent with his pleas, appellant was convicted by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial at Misawa Air Base, Japan, of committing indecent acts and willfully disobeying a command, in violation of Articles 134 and 90, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 934 and 890,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Reno SoundingsidesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. PowellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. Michael GreerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. ButtonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. UretaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  2. United States v. McCarthyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  3. United States v. MeghdadiCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  4. United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  5. United States v. GibsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API