Legal Opinion

Lazar v. Fea Leasing, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Fea Leasing, Inc., and Patrick McCoy appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), entered July 18, 1998, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

This action arises…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. EconAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Morowitz v. NaughtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Viegas v. EspositoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Wright v. MorozinisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Delasoudas v. KoudellouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. O'Malley v. USA Waste of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. LeGrand v. Primus Automotive Financial Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Alexiou v. AlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Matusovskaya v. ValcourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API