Legal Opinion

United States v. Elrod

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided June 20, 1984No. ACM 24272PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

The evidentiary issue before us — admissibility of a record of nonjudicial punishment — arose during the presentencing portion of Senior Airman Elrod’s general court-martial in England. The military judge, over defense objection, admitted a locally-held copy of an Article 15 record of nonjudicial punishment.1 We find he erred and reassess the sentence.

Two provisions reveal which personnel records of an accused properly may be offered by the prosecution on presentencing. First, Paragraph 75b (2) of the Manual for Courts-Martial provides that:

Under regulations of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  2. United States v. MercierU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1978
  3. United States v. YongU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983
  4. United States v. TerrellU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. GoddenUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API