Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Tremane D. Carthen

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 25, 2018No. 16-17653; 16-17753Published

1ConcurrenceWilliam Pryor, Circuit Judge

I join the panel's opinion in full. I write separately to explain that our precedents interpreting Federal Rule of Evidence 608(b) to prohibit impeachment by contradiction are irreconcilable with the current text of that Rule. "Impeachment by contradiction occurs when a party offers evidence to prove that a fact to which a witness testified is not true." 27 Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal Practice and Procedure § 6096 (2d ed. 2007). But the current version of Rule 608(b) regulates the admission of evidence of a witness's character for truthfulness or untruthfulness, not impeachment by…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. Ernest Nda Akpan Chijioke Victor Okoro, M.D., Also Known as Victor Okoro, Also Known as Chiji v. OkoroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Keith McGillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Smith Grading and Paving, Inc. And Herbert P. Lee, Iii, United States of America v. Dellinger, Inc. And Theodore C. DellingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API