People v. Hicks
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of robbery in the first degree. He contends that the trial court committed prejudicial error in ruling admissible a written statement he made to another judge in the post-conviction proceedings of an earlier, related case; that the photographic identification procedure here used was unduly suggestive; and that the finding he was armed at the time of the offense was improper and should be stricken from the judgment. We conclude that only the last of these contentions warrants relief.
The victim, Michael Fisher, was a taxicab…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.