Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Rose
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 20, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Hempstead dated November 18, 1992, which, after a hearing, found the respondent Mary Carson’s commercial use of her home to be a legal nonconforming use, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Gold-stein, J.), entered May 11, 1994, which dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is granted, and the determination is annulled.
Beginning in the late 1920’s, the father of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Marzella v. MunroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Garcia v. HolzeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Daggett v. PutnamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Calcagni Construction Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of Tri-Serendipity, LLC v. City of KingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Lindstrom v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Town Board of Southampton v. CredidioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005