Legal Opinion
Staggs v. Chrysler Corp.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided January 25, 1988No. Civ. A. 4:85-CV-352-RLVPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VINING, District Judge.
The above-styled action, sounding in tort, is before the court on Chrysler Motor Corporation’s (Chrysler’s) motion for partial summary judgment and Harold Staggs’ and Lou Rummage’s motion for leave to amend their complaint.
On July 27, 1984, Margaret Staggs (“Mrs. Staggs”) was riding in a 1984 Dodge Ram Charger driven by her sister, Lou Rummage (“Rummage”). The two women were in transit from Columbia, Tennessee, to Tallapoosa, Georgia. While passing through Cedartown, Georgia, the vehicle left the road, struck a curb and a mailbox, and ultimately collided with a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- International Paper Co. v. OuelletteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wisconsin Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations v. Gould Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vanover v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Emma Taylor v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Cellucci v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Gingold v. Audi-Nsu-Auto Union, A.G.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Cooper v. General Motors Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Cellucci v. General Motors Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.