Legal Opinion

People v. Bassage

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 2007No. Docket 271910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurray, J.

Defendant was charged with perjury committed in a court proceeding for a capital crime, MCL 750.422. Defendant moved to dismiss the charge, arguing that when called by the prosecution as a witness in an underlying murder case, he had to choose between (1) incriminating himself for filing a false police report or (2) lying. Faced with this dilemma, and because he was never advised of his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself, defendant argued that his testimony was obtained in violation of the United States Constitution and could not be used against him in his perjury trial.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. MandujanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bryson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. HughesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. People of Michigan v. Belinda Denise JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. People of Michigan v. Jordan Christopher DanskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. People v BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API