Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Van Straaten v. Shell Oil Products Co. LLC

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 18, 2012No. 11-8031Published

1ConcurrenceCudahy, Circuit Judge

I join without reservation the comprehensive majority opinion and write separately only to comment briefly on the issue of willfulness that is the sole basis of decision here. “Willfulness” may include recklessness, and that is specifically the question here. See Safeco Ins. Co. v. Burr, 551 U.S. 47, 69, 127 S.Ct. 2201, 167 L.Ed.2d 1045 (2007); see also Long v. Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A., Inc., 671 F.3d 371 (3d Cir.2012). According to Safeco, at least with unclear text and in the absence of authoritative guidance or case law, the appropriate and sole measure of recklessness is objective…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Randy Long v. Tommy Hilfiger USA IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  3. Van Straaten v. SHELL OIL PRODUCTS CO., LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API