Legal Opinion
Gilpin v. Savage
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1908PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Action upon a promissory note.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
This action is brought against the indorser of a promissory note made by his son, Walter Savage, and by its terms made payable at the residence of the maker, No. 507 Prospect avenue, in the city of Buffalo, N. Y. The note is held by the indorsee of the original payee and was forwarded by him for collection to the Columbia National Bank of Buffalo.
On the day of the maturity of the note a clerk in the employ of the bank called up the maker on the telephone. The maker responded to the call at his house. The clerk then stated to the maker that the bank held the note for collection, described it,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wolfe v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Woolsey v. . FunkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Murphy v. . JackNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Lockwood v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1847
- McGruder v. Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Jefferson City, Mo. v. Cingular WirelessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Toll v. Monitor Binding & Printing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Hodges v. BlaylockOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Gilpin v. Columbia National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- City of Springfield v. Cingular WirelessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.