Legal Opinion
Northvale v. Blundo
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 6, 1964PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
85 N.J. Super. 56 (1964)
203 A.2d 721
BOROUGH OF NORTHVALE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MARIO BLUNDO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 28, 1964.
Decided October 6, 1964.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, SULLIVAN and LABRECQUE.
Mr. James P. Logan argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Logan & Logan, attorneys).
Mr. James J. Hogger argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Fornabai & Hogger, attorneys; Mr. Hogger, on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.
Defendant was convicted in the Northvale Municipal Court for violation of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schmidt v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF NEWARKSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Pratt v. Building Inspector of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Chatham v. DonaldsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Zahn v. Newark Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Dumais v. SomersworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc. v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR TOWNSHIP OF CHATHAMNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Whaley v. Dorchester County Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Livingston Tp. v. MarchevNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Shim v. Washington Township Planning BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- SCHANTZ v. RachlinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.