People v. Engelsen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: The People appeal from an order granting those parts of defendant’s omnibus motion seeking to dismiss counts two and four of the indictment, charging defendant with endangering the welfare of a child (Penal Law § 260.10 [1]). *1290Upon our review of the sealed grand jury minutes, we agree with the People that the evidence before the grand jury was legally sufficient to support a prima facie case of endangering the welfare of a child. “A person is guilty of [that crime] when . . . [h]e or she knowingly acts in a manner likely to be injurious to the physical, mental or moral welfare of a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. ManiniNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. SimmonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. ChaseAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. StillwagonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. Four-RosenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
- People v. HollmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
- People v. RogalskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. StillwagonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.