Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Rogalski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 23, 2012Published

1Dissent

Centra, J.P., and Lindley, J.

(dissenting). We respectfully dissent and would affirm the order granting that part of defendant’s omnibus motion seeking to dismiss count three of the indictment, charging her with endangering the welfare of a child (Penal Law § 260.10 [1]). “A person is guilty of [that crime] when . . . [h]e or she knowingly acts in a manner likely to be injurious to the physical, mental or moral welfare of a child less than [17] years old” (id.). We conclude, and the majority apparently does not dispute, that the evidence before the grand jury, viewed in the light most…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. ManiniNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. HitchcockNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. People v. SimmonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API