McInturff v. Neeseman
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANKS, J.
This appeal focuses on the action of the Chancellor in striking defendants’ jury demand, as a sanction for failing to file jury instructions, in accordance with a pre-trial order.
Defendants in their answer, timely demanded a jury, and the Chancellor, pursuant to Rule 16 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure, entered an order giving notice of the date for a pre-trial conference, and ordered the parties to file pretrial memoranda with the Court at least five days before the pre-trial conference, and set forth certain matters to be contained in the memoranda. Additionally,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brooks v. United Uniform Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- McBride v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baron Construction, LLC v. 4J Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024
- Du Sik Lee and Won Jae Lee v. Kenneth R. Davis and Linda P. DavisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
- Marc Kayem v. William StewartCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003