Legal Opinion

Brooks v. United Uniform Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1984PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

The sole issue in this worker’s compensation case involves plaintiffs effort to obtain reimbursement of expenses and attorney’s fees under T.R.C.P. 37.03, as a sanction against defendant for objecting to certain requests for admissions of facts under rule thirty-six.

Plaintiff sought recovery of benefits arising from two separate accidents, one alleged to have occurred on September 23, 1982, and the other alleged to have occurred on October 18, 1982. At the conclusion of the trial, the court found that plaintiff did not prove that the alleged injury of September 23 was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Popeil Brothers, Inc. v. Schick Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  2. Holt v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Young v. BarrowCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  2. Lyle v. Exxon Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Wright v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  4. Buckner v. HassellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  5. Langlois v. ENERGY AUTOMATION SYSTEMS, INC.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API