Legal Opinion
In Re Tabor
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 29, 1999No. 19-50091PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARILYN SHEA-STONUM, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter came before the Court on the jurisdictional issue raised regarding the eligibility of Donald and Karen Tabor (together, “Debtors”) to be chapter 13 debtors based on the potential that Debtors’ noncontingent, liquidated, unsecured debt exceeds the limit under 11 U.S.C. § 109(e) for eligibility to file a chapter 13 case. This issue was raised in motions to dismiss filed by several creditors as well as in objections to confirmation filed by several creditors and the chapter 13 trustee (the “Trustee”). The Court will address the matter in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In the Matter of Timothy R. Pearson and Mary T. Pearson, Debtors. Comprehensive Accounting Corporation v. Timothy R. Pearson and Mary T. PearsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Nicholes v. Johnny Appleseed of Washington (In Re Nicholes)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- G. Harold King, Jr., and Shirley G. King v. Fidelity National Bank of Baton Rouge, Capital Investment Inc. And Louisiana Equity Capital Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Matter of RedburnUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996
- In Re HutchensUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re HatzenbuehlerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2002
- In Re SternUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- In re KwiatkowskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
- In Re FusonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- In Re SaundersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.