Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Goodson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 20, 1978No. 8560PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

Appellant, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, presents here the single contention that the judgment of the district court awarding appellee, Morris E. Goodson, worker’s compensation benefits for total and permanent disability must be reversed because the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support the court’s finding that, at the time appellee received his injury, he was an employee of the insurance subscriber, James Dillard. 1

Appellant’s point that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law constitutes a “no evidence” point. Airway…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Industrial Indemnity Exchange v. SouthardTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Halliburton v. Texas Indemnity InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Hilgenberg v. ElamTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Anchor Casualty Company v. HartsfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1965

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Limestone Products Distribution, Inc. v. McNamaraTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Thompson v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Rhode IslandTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Dougherty v. GiffordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Stoker v. Furr's, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1991
  5. Smith v. Altman, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API