Burke v. Bours
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Harrisok,
this action was here upon the last appeal (92 Cal. 108), the facts before the court were that Bours had been employed by Faulkner, Bell & Co., who were agents of Arguello, to make a sale of the land, and had reported to them a sale thereof for the sum of four thousand five hundred dollars, sending at the same time a form of a deed to be executed by Arguello, without, however, inserting the amount of the consideration, or the name of the grantee; that Arguello filled in the amount of the consideration, and executed the deed without inserting the name of any grantee; that when Bours…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rochester v. LeveringIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Burke v. BoursCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by10 opinions
- Williams v. LockwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Campbell v. BeardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
- Salisbury v. YawgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Neighbor v. Pacific Realty Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1912
- Sumner v. JonesHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.