Legal Opinion
Rochester v. Levering
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided January 9, 1886No. 11,698PublishedCited by 33 opinions
From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
A complaint filed by John Levering against Madeline Rochester, and a cross complaint filed by the latter against Levering, constitute the basis of the controversy exhibited in the record in this case.
The complaint seeks a recovery upon an account exhibited with it, for services rendered, money loaned, paid out and expended by the plaintiff at the defendant’s instance and request. The cross complaint charges that from the year 1862, down to and including the year 1878, the plaintiff, Levering, was in the relation of agent and attorney to the defendant, Mrs. Rochester, having in charge the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Prevost v. GratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- New-York Central Ins. Co. v. . National Protection Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1856
- M'Cormick v. MalinIndiana Supreme Court · 1841
- Moore v. MandlebaumMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Sherman v. HoglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Shirk v. NeibleIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Feder v. FieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- McCord v. BrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
- San Pedro Lumber Co. v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Thomas v. MerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.