Legal Opinion
Holdren v. Morris
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 17, 1947PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVandermeulen, J.
A building known as 174 Court Street, Buffalo, New York, was being demolished by the defendants, Orval C. Morris and Nelson J. Reimann, members of a copartnership doing business under the firm name and style of Morris & Reimann. The defendants entered into an agreement with one Melvin Rupp whereby his equipment for breaking up concrete floors was rented out to defendants, together with the services of one of his employees, at a price of $2.75 per hour. The work was commenced in September, 1939. Because of *674weather conditions the work ceased and was resumed in March, 1940.
On March 19,1940, the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Coughtry v. . Globe Woolen Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Pauckner v. WakemIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Caspersen v. La Sala Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Hess v. Bernheimer & Schwartz Pilsener Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Haefeli v. Woodrich Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Robert E. McKee, General Contractor, Inc. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Holdren v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949