Agrashell, Inc. v. BERNARD SIROTTA COMPANY
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, District Judge.
The several motions arise out of three suits involving the same patent (Re-issue No. 23,422, 1951, of No. 2,421,806, 1947) on a method and material for removing carbon from internal combustion engines through use of “pelletized” black walnut shells or other “pelletized” nut shells of like hardness.
One case, Agrashell, Inc. v. Hammons Products, 279 F.Supp. 522, W.D.Mo., S.D., has now been tried by the Honorable William R. Collinson on all the patent issues, and he held claims 2, 4, 7, 8, 10 and 11 of the re-issue patent invalid and the method claims (2, 7 and 8) not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Olga Zdanok v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods Division, Frank T. Alexander v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Triplett v. LowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Harold S. Divine and Rita K. Divine v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Costello v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Agrashell, Inc. v. Hammons Products Company, Hammons Products Company v. Agrashell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Harold S. Divine and Rita K. Divine v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974