Legal Opinion

City of Amarillo v. Rust

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 6, 1932No. 3707PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.

The plaintiff, Geraldine Rust, by her father, Con Rust, as next friend, instituted this suit in the district court of Potter county, Tex., against the defendant, the city of Amarillo, to recover damages for personal injuries she sustained on account of the alleged negligence of the defendant.

The plaintiff alleges:

That the defendant is a municipal corporation, with exclusive control over its streets, and that South Houston street, at its intersection with East Fifteenth street, is, and has been for many years, a public street, having been dedicated as such to the public for use as a street.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Robertson & Mueller v. HoldenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. West Texas Coaches, Inc. v. MadiTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  3. Texas Mexican Ry. Co. v. HoyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  4. Texas Power & Light Co. v. CulwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  5. City of Amarillo v. TutorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Texas Utilities Co. v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Gordon v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. City of Waco v. TeagueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Siratt v. Worth Const. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API