Legal Opinion

Maryland Coal Co. v. Baker

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 24, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Garrett County. The first appeal in this case is reported in 84 Md. 19. On the first trial in the Court below the case was taken away from the jury. An instruction was given to the effect that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. The prayers presented by the plaintiff were rejected and upon the judgment being entered against him he appealed.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Garrett County. The first appeal in this case is reported in 84 Md. 19. On the first trial in the Court below the case was taken away from the jury. An instruction was given to the effect that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. The prayers presented by the plaintiff were rejected and upon the judgment being entered against him he appealed. In 84 Md. 19, that judgment was reversed and it was held that the prayer which was granted ought to have been rejected, and that those which were rejected ought to have been granted. The record was then remanded for…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

McSherry, C. J.,

No. 8, January term, 1897. Recorded in Liber J. S. F., No. 2, etc., folio827, of “ Opinions Unreported.”

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tu v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Mung Sen Tu v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Amabile v. WinklesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Barrett v. Lohmuller Building Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API