Legal Opinion

Amabile v. Winkles

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 5, 1977No. 408, September Term, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This case is before this Court for the second time. Our initial opinion is reported in Amabile v. Winkles, 24 Md. App. 292, 330 A. 2d 473 (1975). The case was also before the Court of Appeals, and that Court’s opinion is reported in Amabile v. Winkles, 276 Md. 234, 347 A. 2d 212 (1975). Reference should be made to those two opinions for a more complete statement of facts than is necessary for this opinion.

In the original proceedings the chancellor found that the appellees, the Winkles, were entitled to a right-of-way across the land of the appellants and to an injunction requiring the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fidelity-Baltimore National Bank & Trust Co. v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  2. Jacober v. High Hill Realty, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Walzl v. KingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  4. Hanley v. StulmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Amabile v. WinklesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beck v. MangelsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. IA Construction Corp. v. CarneyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Fiol v. Howard County Board of AppealsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API