Legal Opinion

Charles Daniel Lindsey v. City of Orrick, Missouri, Shirley Taylor

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 26, 2007No. 06-3299PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYE, Circuit Judge.

Charles Daniel Lindsey sued the City of Orriek, Missouri (the City) and its mayor, Shirley Taylor, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging an unlawful dismissal of him for accusing the City Council (Council) of violating Missouri’s open meetings law, accusations he claims were constitutionally protected speech. Taylor and the City moved for summary judgment which was denied. Taylor appeals arguing the district court 1 erred in finding she was not entitled to qualified immunity. We affirm.

I

The facts viewed most favorably to Lindsey are as follows. The City employed Lindsey as its…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Howard v. Kansas City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. Anzaldua v. Northeast Ambulance & Fire Protection DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  3. Foraker v. ChaffinchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  4. Bonner v. OutlawCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. Foley v. Town of RandolphCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API