Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Riddle

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Bates Circuit Court. — Hon. E. P. Wright, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Martin, C.

The 'plaintiff's sue as joint obligees in a bond. The bond was executed by J ames Biddle, defendant, as sole obligor, in favor of the plaintiffs and the de*522fendant Smith, as joint obligees. It seems that defendant, James Riddle, sold to Josiah J. Ryan, Luther Shobe and Frank Smith, a stock of tools used by him in the tin business, and that in consideration of the sale he gave them his written obligation conditioned that he would not manufacture tinware or sell stoves in the town of Butler for the space of one year. The plaintiffs, being two of the obligees, bring this suit, alleging…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark v. CableSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855
  2. Rainey v. SmizerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  3. Andrews v. Mokelumne Hill Co.California Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Hill v. MarshIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. McAllen v. WoodcockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. C. H. Albers Commission Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. State ex rel. Dutcher v. SheltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  3. Churchill v. LammersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. McLaran v. WilhelmMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Peters v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API