Legal Opinion

Hill v. Marsh

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1874PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

In the court below, the appellee Samuel S. Marsh was the plaintiff, and the appellants and the appellee Jeremiah W. Malinee were the defendants.

The complaint alleged, in substance, that on the 14th of February, 1865, said Marsh and Malinee owned two-thirds-of all the machinery, real estate, personal property, rights,, credits, and interests belonging to the concern then owned by them and Hicks King, doing business under the firm, name of S. S. Marsh & Co., known as the “ Hoosier Rolling-Mill that on said day Marsh and Malinee agreed with appellants to sell them one-third of their two-thirds…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berkshire v. ShultzIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Bennett v. PrestonIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Madison & Indianapolis Railroad v. TaffeIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Greenup v. CrooksIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Conlee Construction Co. v. Cay Construction Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  3. Ryan v. RiddleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. Frankel v. GarrardIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Summers v. HutsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API