Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ware v. Pierce

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 2024No. 2023-0101Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 177 Ohio St.3d 86.] THE STATE EX REL. WARE v. PIERCE. [Cite as State ex rel. Ware v. Pierce,

2024-Ohio-2663.] Mandamus—Public-records requests—Requester failed to meet his burden to show a clear legal right to the requested relief and a clear legal duty of respondent to provide the relief sought—Writ denied. (No. 2023-0101—Submitted January 9, 2024—Decided July 16, 2024.) IN MANDAMUS. __________________ The per curiam opinion below was joined by KENNEDY, C.J., and FISCHER, DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ. KENNEDY, C.J., authored a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Greenlaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State Ex Rel. McCaffrey v. Mahoning County Prosecutor's OfficeOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. United States v. Michael Keith SamuelsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. State Ex Rel. American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, Inc. v. Cuyahoga County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API