Bezio v. Neville
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.
The sole question presented for decision in this case is whether Laws 1969, ch. 478 was constitutionally enacted. The effect of the statute as applied to this case is to terminate eligibility for Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) upon the remarriage of the mother. In September 1972, the plaintiff informed the State welfare office that she had remarried, whereupon her AFDC payments were promptly terminated on the basis of a departmental regulation adopted pursuant to Laws 1969, ch. 478, amending RSA 167:2 and RSA 546-A:l. Plaintiff initiated this proceeding in superior court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Constitutionality of Chapter 315, Laws of 1943Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- State ex rel. Stanford v. EllingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Pollard v. GreggSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
- Stanford v. . EllingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Attorney-General v. ShepardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1882
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Baines v. New Hampshire Senate PresidentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Pirtle v. Legis. CouncilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2021
- Union Leader Corp. v. ChandlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Messier v. ZeillerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1974