Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1903No. 1257PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the First District, in an appeal from De Witt County. The bank obtained writ of error upon the affirmance, on its appeal, of a judgment for the defendant in its suit against the railway company, which had impleaded the compress company and Koenig & Van Hoogenhuyze.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Chief Justice.

This is a Avrit of -error to a judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals of the First Supreme Judicial District, Avhich affirmed judgment is in favor of the defendant rendered by the District Court of De Witt County in a suit brought by plaintiff in error against the defendant in error, the San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railroad Company.

We can not give a better statement of the case than that made by the Chief Justice of the Court of Civil Appeals in the opinion delivered by that court on the appeal. It is as folloAvs:

“This action was brought by the First National Bank of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. FordTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Hargrave v. Vaughn & CummingTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Dwyer v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lofland v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  2. Gussett v. Nueces CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. Sutton v. Otis Elevator Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Armstrong v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. City of San Antonio v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API