Will v. Kizer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARLER, J.
Kenneth Kizer, Director of the Department of Health Services (Director and Department, respectively), appeals from the trial court’s judgment ordering a peremptory writ of mandate. The dispute involves plaintiff Willard Will’s eligibility for Medi-Cal benefits. When he applied, Will and his wife owned a commercial building in downtown Marysville assessed at $154,792 and appraised at $197,500. Although the building produced no income and attempts to sell it for $180,000 were unsuccessful, the Department concluded that Will’s interest in the building made him ineligible for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Schweiker v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Atkins v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shoban v. Board of Trustees of Desert Center Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- United States v. Rainbow FamilyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Physicians & Surgeons Laboratories, Inc. v. Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Anthony v. KizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Gardner v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Gardner v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Gonzalez v. City Nat'l Bank, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019